Standards Policy & Resource Updates

Effective July 1, 2025

Mandatory October 1, 2025

This calibration clarifies how Textile Exchange-IDs (TE-IDs) will be assigned and implemented for farms under the Responsible Down Standard (RDS) and Responsible Animal Fiber (RAF) standards.

It applies to all farms listed on a scope certificate under the following process codes:

• PR0037 – Farming (area)
• PR0038 – Farming (communal)
• PR0011 – Farming (group)
• PR0036 – Farming (individual)

Farms that are already listed as the certified organization (i.e. the main site on the scope certificate) are not affected, as they already have TE-IDs.

What’s changing:

• Farms listed on a scope certificate (but not acting as the certified organization) will now receive TE-IDs.
• Textile Exchange will generate these IDs based on existing dTrackit data uploaded before July 1, 2025.
• Certification bodies will receive a file with assigned TE-IDs for each applicable farm by August 15, 2025.
• Certification bodies must either:
  • Distribute these TE-IDs to each farm, or
  • Instruct the certified organization to do so (and verify this by the next scheduled audit).
• For farms not captured in the initial list, registration may occur either through the TE-ID portal or via a bulk upload facilitated by the certification body.

Why it matters:

Assigning TE-IDs to all certified farms strengthens traceability at the source and brings farm-level data into alignment with the rest of the certified supply chain. It enables more reliable linkage between farms, scope certificates, and farm-level data.

How it helps you:

• Improved traceability: Every farm now has a unique identifier, making it easier to verify certification details and manage changes like farm group transfers.
• Fewer gaps in data: Including TE-IDs on farm surveys and scope certificates ensures complete records across all certified entities.
• Streamlined updates: If a farm moves to a different group, no new registration is required – its TE-ID stays the same.

Key deadlines and requirements:

• August 15, 2025: Certification bodies receive pre-assigned TE-IDs from Textile Exchange.
• Within 30 days: Certification body or certified organization must notify farms of their TE-IDs.
• October 1, 2025, onward:
  • TE-IDs must be listed on all new or updated scope certificates and farm surveys.
  • Data submissions to Textile Exchange must include TE-IDs for all listed farms.

For farms, only the TE-ID, country/area, and state/province (if applicable) will be publicly visible. Names and addresses remain private unless the farm is a certified organization.

For all details related to Calibration 283, access the ASR-221 Calibration Log.

Textile Exchange has released the Quick Guide to Product Labeling (TE-TXL-GUI-602-V1.0) to help brands, suppliers, and retailers navigate the requirements for making product-related claims under our standards system. The guide provides a practical overview of what is needed to label certified products accurately and in compliance with the Content Claim Standard (CCS) and the Standards Claims Policy.

What's included:

The Quick Guide clarifies how certification connects to product labeling, explains that product claims must be substantiated with transaction certificates, and outlines how brands need to be certified to make on-product claims. It also clarifies how suppliers and retailers can communicate about certified products while maintaining compliance.

Why it matters:

Certified product claims build trust with customers and stakeholders. They demonstrate that sustainability messages are more than marketing and are verified by a third-party system that traces materials from start to final product. By following the requirements in the CCS and Standards Claims Policy, brands help ensure the integrity and credibility of their sustainability claims.

How it helps you:

• Brands will better understand their requirements for certification and claim approvals.
• Suppliers will gain clarity on the type of off-product claims they can make.
• Retailers will know how to communicate about certified products without introducing unverified claims and maintain compliance.

For further information, please refer to the Quick Guide for Product Labeling (TE-TXL-GUI-602-V1.0).

Effective July 1, 2025

No mandatory date at this time.

This calibration provides clarification on who is responsible for completing and submitting the updated Reclaimed Material Declaration Form (TE-MM-TEM-105) and outlines the context regarding the transition to the new TE-MM-TEM-105 form. It is not yet mandatory, but TE-MM-TEM-105 will be required for all reclaimed inputs under the Materials Matter Standard.

What’s changing:

• The first certified organization in the supply chain - whether a collector, concentrator, or recycler - is responsible for completing and submitting the RMDF to their certification body.
• If using the new RMDFs, they must be submitted more frequently to increase traceability.
• Certified collectors and concentrators should obtain Transaction Certificates for any reclaimed materials they sell.
• The updated TE-MM-TEM-105 form may now replace the prior RMDF templates under GRS and RCS.

For full details on the form’s structure, data fields, and benefits, access the form through the Textile Exchange Knowledge Center (link here).

.

For all details related to Calibration 276, access the ASR-221 Calibration Log.

Effective January 1, 2026 - Applies to All Certification Bodies

Textile Exchange is implementing a revised certification fee structure, outlined in Textile Exchange Certification Fee Structure (TE-TXL-POL-701-V1.0), to bring greater consistency, transparency, and accountability to how certification system costs are shared. This policy is effective and mandatory on January 1, 2026, and replaces the previous structure in ASR-107-V2025.0.

The new structure is designed to make fees easier to calculate by moving to a flat rate fee calculated per each certified organization certified by each certification body.

It is critical to note that these fees are charged to the certification body and not paid directly by the certified organization to Textile Exchange. Certification bodies may include this fee in their pricing.

What’s changing:

• A flat certification fee of $525 USD will apply to each certified organization (identified by a TE-ID) listed as the main holder of the scope certificate (i.e. not individual sites or facilities).
• This change eliminates additional fees for associated subcontractors and facilities listed on the scope certificate—only the certified organization will incur a charge to the certification body.
• Farm organizations (i.e. any certified organization with a farm process code in their scope certificate) are excluded from fee calculations charged to certification bodies by Textile Exchange.
• The fee is harmonized across all Textile Exchange Standards and all organization types (e.g., recyclers, traders, processors, brands).

Why it matters:

This policy supports a sustainable and scalable certification system by:

• Moving away from a fragmented site-based model to a cleaner, per-organization structure that aligns better with how certification is issued.
• Creating consistency across standards and certification bodies, simplifying how fees are tracked and communicated.

How it impacts you:

Certified Organizations:

• The new flat-rate fee structure creates a clear and predictable pricing model. However, some organizations, such as those without associated subcontractors or additional sites, may see an increase in certification-related costs compared to the prior fee model.
• On the other hand, organizations that previously had many associated subcontractors or facilities may see fewer overall charges, since the certification body will only be subject to one $525 fee per certified organization.

Certification Bodies:

• The per certified organization fee streamlines administration and aligns directly with how certificates are issued. It supports stronger integration with digital tools like Trackit and simplifies reconciliation at year-end.

What’s staying the same:

• Fees are only charged to certification bodies, not directly to certified organizations.
• Certification and audit requirements remain unchanged.
• The same TE-ID structure will continue to be used to identify certified organizations.

Next steps:

• Certification bodies should review TE-TXL-POL-701-V1.0 and prepare to apply the new model to all certificates issued on or after January 1, 2026.
• Certified organizations should expect to see this fee reflected in their certification body’s pricing and can ask their CB for clarification if needed.

Review all details in the Textile Exchange Certification Fee Structure (TE-TXL-POL-701-V1.0)

For questions or clarifications, reach out to your certification body or contact standards@textileexchange.org.

Effective Date: July 1, 2025

A new calibration and updated form are now available to improve how reclaimed materials are tracked as they enter GRS and RCS certified supply chains. The updated Reclaimed Material Declaration Form (TE-MM-TEM-105) may replace the previous versions found in Appendix C of GRS-101 and RCS-101. It is not yet mandatory, but TE-MM-TEM-105 will be required for all reclaimed inputs under the Materials Matter Standard.

What’s changing:

• The first certified organization in the supply chain - whether a collector, concentrator, or recycler - is responsible for completing and submitting the RMDF to their certification body.
• If using the new RMDFs, they must be submitted more frequently to increase traceability.
• Certified collectors and concentrators should obtain Transaction Certificates for any reclaimed materials they sell.
• The updated TE-MM-TEM-105 form may now replace the prior RMDF templates under GRS and RCS.

Why it matters:

Today, tracking reclaimed materials, especially textile waste, often relies on manual documentation. This slows down certificate processing and limits the ability to scale traceability systems.

By introducing a standardized format with clear responsibilities, this update enables more complete and reliable data collection.

How it helps you:

• Reduces delays: RMDFs submitted correctly and consistently help avoid back-and-forth and speed up Transaction Certificate issuance.
• Improves traceability: Collecting origin, composition, and classification data in a structured and more timely way enables better visibility for downstream buyers and brands.
• Prepares for the future: The form integrates with Trackit, laying the foundation for digitized, scalable tracking under the upcoming Materials Matter Standard.

Next steps:

• Download the new TE-MM-TEM-105 form (link here).
• Begin using it now, as it will be required for all reclaimed inputs under the Materials Matter Standard.
• Coordinate with your certification body to ensure they are ready to process and upload the form to Trackit.

Early adoption is encouraged to support a smooth transition.

Please reach out to standards@textileexchange.org with any questions.

Effective October 1, 2025

Mandatory December 1, 2025

Textile Exchange is introducing a Material Ledger to improve how certified input volumes are tracked and managed across the supply chain. This system will record the available balance of certified materials for each organization, acting like a digital inventory that supports real-time reconciliation between dTrackit and eTrackit.

The Material Ledger Policy (ASR-117-V1.0) outlines the criteria for setting up and maintaining this ledger, beginning with a critical first step: uploading opening balances for all certified inputs held as of October 1, 2025.

What’s changing:

• Certification bodies must upload opening balances for each certified organization before December 1, 2025. These balances reflect the volume of certified inputs available for use as of October 1, 2025.
• Starting October 1, only transaction certificates and eTransactions dated on or after that date will count toward the ledger balance.
• Material ledger balances will become visible to certified organizations starting January 1, 2026, once opening balances and relevant transactions are in place.
• Volume updates will be required at least annually through volume adjustments.
• An alternative upload method is introduced to cover eligible historical transaction certificates and GOTS inputs not previously uploaded to dTrackit.

Why it matters:

• Until now, volume reconciliation has been managed individually by certification bodies using their own systems. The material ledger addresses this by introducing a single, centralized system that tracks certified input volumes across all certified organizations.

This system:

• Supports automated checks for available volumes before issuing transaction certificates.
• Links all certified material movements to a live balance.
• Enables digital traceability at scale, preparing the system for future data and reporting needs under TE-TXL-POL-203 Policy for Scope and Transaction Certificates.

How it helps you:

• For Certified Organizations: You’ll gain a live view of your available certified input volumes within Trackit. This improves visibility across sites and helps prevent overdraws, delays, or manual back-and-forth with your certification body.
• For Certification Bodies: The ledger streamlines the TC approval process by integrating volume checks directly into Trackit. It reduces manual reconciliation work and centralizes oversight, improving efficiency and audit-readiness.
• For Brands and Buyers: The material ledger builds trust and transparency, allowing you to verify that materials used in your supply chain are available, certified, and correctly tracked from origin to final product. It also enables better forecasting and procurement alignment based on real-time material availability.

What you need to do now:

Certification bodies must:

• Upload opening balances between October 1 and December 1, 2025.
• Follow ASR-117 and ASR-217 for guidance on calculation and formatting.
• Maintain clear records of how balances were determined and ensure only one opening balance per input per certified organization is uploaded.

Certified organizations should:

• Work with their certification body to ensure all certified input volumes on hand as of October 1, 2025, are accounted for.
• Understand that no opening balance = no volume available for certified sales in the material ledger.

The success of the material ledger depends on timely and accurate opening balance uploads. Without this, certified organizations will show a zero balance and will not be able to issue certified transaction certificates or eTransactions after October 1.

Review all details in the Material Ledger Policy (ASR-117-V1.0).

For questions or further guidance, reach out to your certification body or contact standards@textileexchange.org.

Effective July 1, 2025

Mandatory October 1, 2025

Textile Exchange has published an updated version of its foundational reference for identifying acceptable recycled input materials under the Global Recycled Standard (GRS) and Recycled Claim Standard (RCS). The new Guide to Recycled Materials (GRS-202-V2.0) replaces the previous “Guide to Recycled Inputs” (V1.0) and provides updates that improve clarity, alignment with international definitions, and traceability.

It is important to note that the intention of this update was to clarify existing criteria and guidance, not to alter the scope of eligibility for recycled inputs.

What’s changing: This updated guide clarifies guidance on which input materials qualify as “recycled” with GRS/RCS and future Materials Matter System requirements.

Key changes include:

• Updated Title: Changed from “Guide to Recycled Inputs” to “Guide to Recycled Materials” to better reflect the document’s scope.

• Clarity on Criteria versus Guidance: Section A1 outlines how readers are advised to use the document. A table now indicates whether each section contains mandatory criteria or guidance, and whether this is directed at certified organizations or certification bodies.
• Minor Updates to Definitions: Small changes were made to align pre-consumer, post-consumer, and reclaimed definitions with the latest version of ISO 14021. With that said, the intended meaning of these definitions has not changed.
• Further Context on Pre-Consumer Material & Differentiation Between Byproduct and Waste: There is further explanation on the definition of pre-consumer material in sections A5 & A6, with the intention to more clearly differentiate between recovered material diverted from the waste stream and reutilized material. In addition, a decision tree is included which defines a byproduct versus waste.
• Updates to Eligibility Table for Textile Inputs: Minor language updates were made to the table in Section F to provide additional clarification for textile materials.
• Non-Textile Reclaimed Inputs: A new table in Section G2 contains examples of non-textile input sources and their eligibility. Section H1 presents the evaluation of non-textile feedstocks, proposing that certification bodies only need to seek approval from Textile Exchange if a material is not included in the table in Section G2.
• Alternative Pre-Consumer Plastic Definition: Section G1 includes an alternative pre-consumer material definition for plastics, providing further context on regrind and when it is considered a pre-consumer recycled material.
• Updates for Evaluating Innovations for Mechanically Recycled Cotton Yarn & Wool: Sections H3 & H4 have been added for certification bodies to use when evaluating a mechanically recycled cotton or wool yarn that is outside of the parameters of the criteria in Section C2 but has been proposed as an innovation.

Why it matters:

This update creates clearer guidance to help ensure certified materials are classified consistently and backed up by proper documentation. It supports:

• Stronger alignment with international definitions and clearer decision-making during audits and certification.
• More reliable verification of recycled content claims by clearly defining acceptable vs. unacceptable input streams.
• Better system integration with tools like Trackit and TE-ID by promoting standardized material classification.
• System readiness for future digitization, minimizing confusion across certification bodies and facilities as expectations evolve.

How it impacts you:

Recyclers and Collectors:

• You’ll need to review the updated material definitions and confirm that your sourcing and documentation practices align.

Certification Bodies:

• This version provides a clearer framework for evaluating and approving input materials. CBs should begin updating audit checklists and training internal teams on revised material categories and documentation requirements.

Brands and Retailers:

• More consistent input classification helps build stronger trust in certified content claims. Brands should ensure their suppliers are using recycled inputs that meet these clarified definitions to reduce compliance risk.

Next steps:

• The updated guide takes effect on July 1, 2025, with mandatory use starting October 1, 2025.
• Certification bodies and certified organizations should begin training, update procedures, and reviewing purchasing and documentation workflows now.

Review all details in the Guide to Recycled Materials (GRS-202-V2.0).

If composition testing shows a small difference from what’s listed on your Transaction Certificate (TC) but the result is still within the allowed margin of error and meets the minimum certified content required for a product-related claim, you now have more flexibility in how you make your claim.

You can choose to use:

• The percentages from your care label, if they match the test results,
• The percentages listed on the TC, or
• A minimum percentage allowed under our claims policy (see section B3.12.4 of TE-301-V1.3).

Whatever you choose, the percentage still needs to meet the minimum required for making a claim under Textile Exchange standards.

Why this matters: Care labels often need to follow legal labeling laws and show lab-tested results, which might be slightly different from your TC. This update gives you options to stay compliant while still making a certified claim.

For guidance on larger discrepancies or how to handle TCs in those cases, see Calibration 269.

The document is jointly developed by GOTS and Textile Exchange for the harmonized application of their policies for scope and transaction certificates, detailing specific codes for materials, processes and products.

This update introduces new Raw Material codes as requested by certification bodies in order to manage and detail reclaimed materials in the beginning of the recycling process by collectors or recyclers. This is a minor revision of ASR-213. A major revision is planned to align the document with the Materials Matter Standard.

Access the policy here.

Calibration 282 extends the credit accumulation period for organizations using VR2 processes, as the original 12-month limit in CCS-105-V3.1 is not feasible in some cases. Starting May 1st, 2025, the timeline in CCS-105-V3.1 section A2.11 is now extended to 24 months. This calibration may be applied retroactively to credits that expired during the 12 months prior to the publication of this calibration.

Access the calibration log here.

Starting May 1st, 2025, a new data field will be used to capture the certified weight from an input transaction certificate. The current format in the Policy for Transaction Certificates (ASR.104-V3.1, section D2.1.5) is being adjusted to align with what is prescribed by the Certification Body Data Specifications Policy (ASR-507-V2.1). This change in format is needed for the function of the material ledger, which is being developed for the Trackit traceability system. As per the calibration, the field inputTcCertifiedWeightUsed is no longer applicable and has been replaced with inputTcCertifiedRawMaterialWeightUsed.

Access the calibration log here.

To address situations where it is technically challenging to include RDS certified farm group members on scope certificate PDFs, Calibration 280 has been issued to provide clarification.

RDS certified farm group members may be excluded from site listings on scope certificate PDFs, provided that they are included in dTrackit data submissions for the scope certificate. This does not apply to individual farm or farm area certification.

Access the calibration log here.

Requirement E4.3 in the CCS v3.1 asks brands to ensure that certified product sales to other businesses (not consumers) meet the documentation requirements outlined. This calibration clarifies what is considered acceptable to fulfill the requirement.

Brands may now use their Textile Exchange ID (TE-ID) in place of or alongside their license code on invoices or supplementary sales documents. If your invoicing system (such as EDI) does not allow additional certification details, a supplementary sales document may be used to convey this information. Acceptable documents include seasonal product listings, certified style workbooks, or digital documents accessed via a URL included on the invoice.

These documents do not need to be provided with each individual invoice. Instead, they may be issued periodically, such as once per season or per product collection, as long as they are made available no later than 30 days after the invoice date (and may also be provided in advance).

Example: A seasonal product listing sent in April includes the brand’s TE-ID and identifies certified styles. These products are invoiced in July. This document would be sufficient to meet the requirement under CCS-101-V3.1 E4.3.

Access the calibration log here.

Calibration 226 was first published on February 1, 2025. It clarifies the exclusion of additives from the material composition and outlines the methodology for accounting for their presence by weight in the transaction certificates.

In this update, point 8b has been modified. The required data submission syntax varies depending on the method used, so the use of semicolon is not necessarily required on every submission.

Calibration 226 is effective as of March 1, 2025, and should be implemented immediately following that date where possible, with mandatory implementation by July 1, 2025.

Access the calibration log here.

Calibration 220 has been updated and is effective as of March 1, 2025.

The calibration was first issued in 2023 and clarified that when using mixed fibers in raw materials, no material composition test is required to determine the fiber percentages of each fiber present. Instead, the designated mixed fiber codes should be used. These codes are for material recyclers only, and other supply chain operators cannot alter them in output or input transaction certificates, even when the detailed results of a material composition test are available.

A blend of virgin material cannot be defined as "mixed fibers". The mixed-fiber codes are only allowed to be used by recyclers for pre-consumer and post-consumer waste.

The mixed fiber categories RM0258 ("No attribute") and RM0259 ("GOTS") have been removed from Calibration 220, as they were incorrectly included when the calibration was first issued.

No further changes have been made to Calibration 220.

Access the calibration log here.

Textile Exchange is pleased to announce the publication of the TE-TXL-POL-206-V3.0 Complaints Policy. Please note that ASR-110 has been revised and is now released under its new code, TE-TXL-POL-206, and is effective immediately.

The policy outlines how Textile Exchange receives, manages, and addresses complaints and appeals related to Textile Exchange standards, assurance, standards claims, and scheme participants, including certification bodies and accreditation bodies.

This revision clarifies the language and ensures complaints are directed to the appropriate party, refines communication timelines between Textile Exchange, certification bodies and accreditation bodies, and updates terminology for greater accuracy and transparency.

Access the policy here.

This calibration clarifies how the composition of coated, laminated, impregnated, or bonded fabrics, fabrics and yarns with non-textile embellishments (e.g., flock, sequins, beads), and textile products made from them must be specified and claimed, while considering labeling regulations in the country of sale.

The calibration is effective March 1, 2025, with mandatory implementation by July 1, 2025.

Calibration 262 serves as an exception to ASR-104-V3.1 B2.10.6 and B2.11, allowing components of specified non-final products to be listed and claimed. It also permits non-certified components to be listed in Box 10a on the transaction certificate (TC).

The composition must be demonstrated based on components, unless there is a valid justification, for the following:

1. Coated, laminated, impregnated, or bonded fabrics with a film-forming polymeric composition incorporated.
2. Fabrics and yarns that are partially or fully covered with non-textile materials (e.g. flock, sequins, beads).
3. Textile products made from the fabrics and yarns listed above.

Component claims must be made by indicating the material composition of all components of the product in Box 10a, including those that are non-certified. A final product made from the specified fabrics and yarns must use component-based claims, unless:

1. Labeling regulations require a full-product claim in the country of sale; or
2. Non-certified components are treated as trims and do not exceed 10% of the final product.

If the fabric or yarn is sold as a final product (i.e. directly to consumers), existing criteria for final products apply.

EXAMPLE: A 100% recycled post-consumer polyester knitted fabric is coated with PU (polyurethane) film. The coating constitutes 20% by weight of the output product. The product has a net weight of 100 kg.

• Product category: Fabrics (PC0028)
• Product Details: Special Fabrics (PD0063)
• Component 1 in Box 10.a:
• Detail: Base knitted fabric
• Material Composition: 100% Recycled post-consumer polyester (RM0189)
• Net Shipping Weight: 80 kg
• Certified Weight: 80 kg
• Standard (Label Grade): RCS (RCS 100)
• Component 2 in Box 10.a:
• Detail: Coating material
• Material Composition: 100% Polyurethane (RM0210)
• Net Shipping Weight: 20 kg
• Certified Weight: 0 kg
• Standard (Label Grade): na

EXAMPLE: A final product (curtains) is made from fabric with sequins, where the base fabric is RCS certified. The incoming fabric TC shows the sequins as a component. The sequins along with other trims represent less than 10% of the total product weight. The final product is claimed as a whole by entering the total trim amount, including sequins, as supplementary weight.

• Product category: Home Textiles (PC0010)
• Product Details: Curtains (PD0020)
• Material Composition: 100% Recycled post-consumer polyester (RM0189)
• Net Shipping Weight: 215 kg
• Certified Weight: 200 kg
• Supplementary Weight: 15 kg

Access the calibration log here.

Guidance on Trims and 10% Threshold
Previously, there was a lack of clarity regarding the definition of trims and their handling in relation to the 10% threshold under CCS-101-V3.1 D4.4. To address this, we have issued a calibration effective March 1, 2025, with mandatory implementation on July 1, 2025.

Definition of Trims
The calibration clarifies that trims are supplemental decorative or functional items on a product, such as collars, cuffs, buttons, zippers, and labels, which are visible and can be detected without testing (or visible when disassembled). For example, those hidden between layers. Trims differ from packaging materials, as trims remain on the product during consumer use, whereas packaging (e.g., polybags, hangtags) does not. Packaging is excluded from the net weight.

Inclusion in Net Shipping Weight
Trims are included in the net shipping weight as per ASR-104-V3.1 B2.5:

• When Trims ≤ 10% of Product Weight: Non-claimed trims may be excluded from material composition and specified as supplementary weight. Non-textile trims, such as buttons and zippers, should be excluded from the composition unless they are claimed material in which case they should be claimed as components.
• When Trims > 10% of Product Weight: Component claims should be used, or textile-based trims may be included in the material composition to reduce the remaining trim weight to ≤ 10%.

Example:A packaged shirt includes fabric for the main body, pocket, collar, cuffs, buttons, care label, and embroidery. If the trims weigh ≤ 10%, they may be supplementary weight. If > 10%, some textile trims (e.g., cuffs) may be included in the composition. Non-textile trims, such as buttons, are excluded unless claimed.

Access the calibration log here.

Clarification on Margins of Error for Material Composition

ASR-104-V3.1 Policy B2.10.11.d allows for a margin of error of ±3% for blended materials and −2% for non-blended materials. To address discrepancies identified during composition testing mechanically recycled material containing natural fibers, we have issued Calibration 269, effective March 1, 2025, with mandatory implementation by July 1, 2025.

Updated Margins of Error

• Mechanically recycled plant (e.g. cotton) and animal (e.g. wool) fibers: −3% for non-blended materials and ±5% for blended materials containing at least 30% of these fibers.
• Mechanically Recycled Synthetics: Will be addressed in the next policy revision.

Guidance for Transaction Certificates

• If testing discrepancies fall within the allowable margin, the composition stated on the transaction certificate must align with calculated composition. The additional statement, "Composition testing showed variance in material composition within allowable tolerances," must be included.
• Discrepancies exceeding the margin render the material ineligible unless an exemption request to Textile Exchange with supporting analysis is approved.

Exceptions to Exceeding Margins

• Presence of "mixed fibers" where exact content is unknown.
• Trims or isolable fibers used for functional or decorative purposes not reflected in composition tests.

Invoices may differ from the transaction certificate composition within allowable margins due to market-specific legislative requirements. This calibration ensures consistency in addressing testing discrepancies without introducing new testing requirements.

Access the calibration log here.

This calibration is effective as of March 1, with mandatory implementation by July 1, 2025. It provides clarity on the exclusion of additives from the material composition and outlines the methodology for accounting for their presence by weight in the transaction certificates (TCs).

For the purpose of this calibration, additives are defined as non-fiber and non-polymer substances added to textile products to change or improve the properties that exist in the output product. These additives are added directly or together with a carrier polymer.

To support this calibration, two new data fields, "tcProductAdditives" and "tcProductAdditivesWeight", have been created. These fields do not appear on PDF TC at this time but are included in the TC data submission and will be included in the PDF as part of the next major revision to the TC Policy.

Prior to the fabric stage, specific processes may involve the use of considerable amounts of additives, such as pigments, TiO₂, ceramic, charcoal, etc. This may potentially lead to the output weight exceeding the input weight, especially in processes with minimal process loss.

Since additives are not fiber raw materials, they shall be excluded from the material composition. When additives exceed 1% of the net weight, the following shall apply:

• "tcProductInfoAdditional" shall include the text "Additives = X kg", where X is the total weight of additives in kilograms. This should be followed by the name of the additive(s).
• In data submissions, "tcProductAdditives" should contain the name of the additive(s) (separated by a semicolon if more than one).
• In data submissions, "tcProductAdditivesWeight" shall contain the total quantity of the additive(s) in kilograms.

When additives are incorporated using a polymer carrier, the polymer itself shall not be considered an additive, and must be included into the material composition.

In the case of masterbatch use, the pigments may be considered additives, but the polymer in the masterbatch shall not be considered to be an additive. Similarly, for flakes used as a carrier, only the additive should be considered. For simplicity, if the total weight of the masterbatch or flake carrying the additives does not exceed 1% of the net weight, it may be treated as an additive in its entirety.

When an input product includes additives on the input TC, the additives weight shall be ignored in calculating the material composition for the subsequent output TC.

Example: A product has inputs of 950 kg post-consumer polyester and 50 kg polyester masterbatch (40% polyester, 60% pigments), with a 0% loss factor for simplicity.

• Material composition: 98% post-consumer polyester (RM0189) + 2% polyester (RM0186)
• Net weight: 1000 kg
• Certified weight: 950 kg
• tcProductInfoAdditional: "Additives = 30 kg pigments"
• tcProductAdditivesWeight: 30 kg
• tcProductAdditives: pigments

The subsequent TC is based on an input of 1000 kg composed of 98% post-consumer polyester (RM0189) + 2% polyester (RM0186).

Additives used in dyeing, printing, and finishing do not require declaration unless they involve heavy prints such as flock. In these cases, the approach outlined above applies.

Additives in special fabrics (e.g., coating, lamination, impregnation) are treated as components and Calibration 262 applies, while heavy prints and adhesives at the final stage are considered trims and Calibration 268 applies.

Access the calibration log here.

Brands have requested that additional information about animal fiber farm groups be available on transaction certificates (TC), but the current TCs do not support the sharing of this data. Therefore, we have issued a calibration which allows for the farm group(s) to be listed in Box 12 of the TCs using the following formats:

1. "Responsible [fiber type] on this transaction certificate sourced from farm group [Farm group TE-ID] [Optional: Farm group name]."
2. "Responsible [fiber type] in product(s) [product numbers] sourced from farm groups [Farm group 1 TE-ID] [Optional: Farm group 1 name], [Farm group 2 TE-ID] [Optional: Farm group 2 name]."

Conditions for including the above:

• Each input certificate must either name the farm group as seller on the input transaction certificate, or include the declaration specified above.
• All applicable farm groups for the fiber must be listed.
• Products numbers must be identified on the TC unless all the fiber comes from one farm group.

You can include multiple declarations for different products, separated by product details. Certificates issued before this guideline may be updated to add this declaration.

Examples:

• "Responsible wool sourced from farm group TE-12345678 ABC Farming."
• "Responsible mohair in products 1, 2, and 4 sourced from farm groups TE-87654321 and TE-98765432."

Access the calibration log here.

Auditing farm groups for their group management functions typically involves reviewing and controlling documents. However, current procedures (RAF-102-V2.2 and RDS-102-V3.3) do not allow these audits to be conducted remotely. Certification bodies may now audit the group management functions of the ICS for RAF and RDS farm groups remotely. This applies exclusively to group management functions and does not include audits of individual farms or processing and storage facilities.

Access the calibration log here.

Calibration 238, first published in October 2023, clarified that when an organization is GRS certified and wishes to become RCS certified, the certification body may issue an RCS scope certificate for the same scope (including facilities, process categories, etc.) without requiring additional auditing.

A recent update to Calibration 238 specifies that this calibration may be applied only once for a particular certified organization while it holds a GRS scope certification. If the organization wishes to renew the RCS scope in the next certification cycle, a full RCS audit will be required.

Access the calibration log here.

According to section B3.1.7 of the Policy for Scope Certificates (ASR-103 V3.1), brand distribution facilities are required to be listed on SCs issued on or after January 1, 2025. Additionally, previous to January 1st, 2025, brand distribution facilities are not required to be included on a brand’s SC in order to be the consignee on a TC, as per section B2.9.6 of the Policy for Transaction Certificates (ASR-104 V3.1).

In light of the current revision of the Content Claim Standard (CCS V3.1), where aspects of brand certification are being reviewed, Textile Exchange has decided to address the topic of brand distribution facilities via calibration 272. Additionally, we are aware that there has been some confusion as to whether the note in ASR-104 V3.1, section B2.9.6, applies to brand distribution facilities taking possession of non-final products, which the calibration seeks to clarify.

This calibration states that brand distribution facilities are not required to be listed on brand SCs provided they are only taking possession of final products. Section B2.9.6 of ASR-104 will continue to apply to brand distribution facilities which are exclusively taking possession of final products.

Access the calibration log here.

To align with regulatory standards and simplify final product composition calculations, we have issued an optional calibration allowing non-claimed fibers intentionally added in amounts under 5% by weight, to be grouped as “Other Fibers” at the final product stage. This flexibility enables consistency with regulatory terminology and reduces unnecessary complexity in calculations.

Key conditions include:

• Each fiber must comprise less than 5% by weight.
• Only non-claimed fibers (e.g. if there is claimed recycled material, conventional material of the same type may not be labeled as other fiber).
• Applicable only to final products as defined in TE-101.

Raw material code RM0262 with the term "Fibers" or "Fibres" may be used on scope and transaction certificates if these conditions are met. There is no cumulative maximum percentage for such fiber as long as each meets the above conditions. This calibration does not cover unavoidable impurities or unknown fibers, which are addressed under separate calibrations.

There is no cumulative maximum percentage for such fiber as long as each meets the above conditions. However, it is important to note that each organization is responsible for determining whether there are cumulative maximum limits for "Other Fibers" in the regulations which apply to them.

Example: A final product containing "87% Organic Cotton + 4% Polyester + 4% Cotton + 3% Polyamide + 2% Elastane" may be represented on the transaction certificate as one of the followings:

1. 87% Organic Cotton + 4% Polyester + 4% Cotton + 3% Polyamide + 2% Elastane; OR
2. 87% Organic Cotton + 4% Cotton + 9% Other [Fibers]; OR
3. 87% Organic Cotton + 4% Cotton + 7% Other [Fibers] + 2% Elastane (in case needed for label compliance)

Note: 4% Cotton shall not be grouped under "Other Fibres" as it is the same type as organic cotton.

Access the calibration log here.

There has been confusion among accreditation and certification bodies (ABs and CBs) about using Fapiao as supporting documentation for transaction certificates (TCs), with differing views on whether it qualifies as a financial record. The calibration clarifies, under CCS-102 E2.1.1 f, that Fapiao may be treated as a financial record or invoice for TC review, provided its validity is verified through the Chinese government’s online system and the details align with transportation documents. CBs may take additional steps to confirm authenticity, such as re-verifying Fapiao that was submitted as a financial record within 30 days issuance during subsequent audits. This calibration seeks to create consistent and reliable use of Fapiao in the certification processes.

Access the calibration log here.

The OCS-206-V1.4 Global ISO IWA 32:2019 Proficiency Test Initiative has been updated and is effective as of November 1, 2024. It can be accessed publicly through the Textile Exchange Knowledge Center on our website.

This document now aligns with the Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS), the Organic Cotton Accelerator (OCA), and Textile Exchange. The IWA 32:2019 method is officially recognized by ISO and has been replaced with ISO/DIN 5354:1 | 2.

This version will be valid until June 30, 2025, when a new ISO method will be introduced.

Access the policy document here.

Previously, certification bodies could accept GOTS-approved chemicals as equivalent to the ZDHC MRSL for GRS chemical criteria; however, this equivalency ended in December 2023, which caused compliance challenges to clients under GRS-201-V4.2 Implementation Manual Section D2.3.

To address this, we have issued a calibration to clarify that certification bodies may still accept GOTS-approved chemicals as an alternative for ZDHC MRSL compliance.

Access the calibration log here.

In some regions, finding ZDHC-approved labs for all required tests is challenging, and some Wastewater Test Reports don't meet GRS Appendix D criteria.

The calibration clarifies that the GRS does not require ZDHC-approved labs. Per GRS V4.0 C2.3e, testing should be done by trained personnel using the correct equipment. The calibration also clarifies the criteria for acceptable independent wastewater lab reports.

Access the calibration log here.

Textile Exchange is committed to building credible, internationally recognized standards that include assurance, monitoring, and evaluation systems. We follow the ISEAL’s Codes of Good Practice to ensure that all processes are robust and transparent.

As part of being ISEAL Code compliant, we are releasing the ASR-229 Standards System Complaints Report, summarizing all complaints received in 2024 up until October 1.

Please note that due to confidentiality reasons, no further details can be provided beyond what is included in this report.

Access the summary report here.

We have updated the ASR-107-V2025.0 Certification Fee Structure which will become mandatory on January 1, 2025.

Most of the updates in this version focus on clarifying existing criteria and do not represent substantial changes to the requirements.

As of January 1, 2025, there will be no annual licensing fees for certification bodies. However, licensed certification bodies will still be eligible for Textile Exchange membership benefits at no additional charge. All other fees remain applicable and unchanged.

Aspects of the policy that remain unchanged include that sites without physical possession only pay fees if they are the main site. Additionally, distribution facilities that exclusively handle final products (PR0048 process category only) are also exempted from fees. This is outlined under criteria B1.1.2.

Please note that Textile Exchange does not charge fees to certification bodies that are passed on to certified organizations. However, certification bodies have their own fee structures, which may include additional fees.

We intentionally minimized the changes for V2025.0 as we will be reviewing and revising our entire fee structure in depth as part of the transition to the Materials Matter standard system. More details will be shared closer to the release of the Materials Matter Standard.

Access the policy here.

No specific policy update and/or calibration issued this month.

We have updated our Standard Setting Procedures, resulting in ASR-102 Version 4.0, effective July 25, 2024. This update includes significant changes to improve the flow of information and reflects recent organizational adjustments.


Key Changes in ASR-102 Update:

1. Improved Structure and Clarity:
   • Clauses have been reorganized for a more efficient flow of information, with slight edits for clarity.
   • New section headers have been added to clearly define topics and facilitate easier navigation through the document.
2. Review Committee Composition:
   • The composition of the review committee responsible for approving International Working Group (IWG) members has been adjusted to align with changes in Textile Exchange's internal organizational structure over the past two years.
3. IWG Member Composition and Differentiation:
   • The composition and number of IWG members have been updated to differentiate between development/revision processes that include environmental and social criteria versus those that do not, such as the Content Claim Standard.
   • Related to this change, a new clause allows the review committee to adjust the composition and number of IWG members based on the nature of the development or revision.
4. Planning and Review Criteria:
   • New clauses have been added to outline the information considered when planning a standard development. This includes reviewing existing standards in the same space for potential alignment, as well as considering stakeholder feedback and analyzing data related to the performance of the current version of the standard.

What This Means for You:

• Certified organizations should review the updated ASR-102 Version 4.0 to understand the new procedures.
• Engage with the updated process for IWG member selection, particularly if your organization is interested in being involved in the development or revision of Textile Exchange standards.

For more detailed information, please refer to the full policy document here.

Audit Methods Policy (ASR 114) was created from content which was previously included in the CCS Certification Procedures (CCS-102-V3.0) and the Policy for Auditing Under Force Majeure Conditions (ASR 109a, now retired) to consolidate key auditing guidance together. Based on guidance from ISEAL, the intent is to harmonize the criteria across Textile Exchange standards and ensure that it is easily accessible to certification bodies and auditors.

Expanding on CCS-102, this policy goes into more depth regarding hybrid and remote audit best practices.

The policy primarily contains existing criteria from within the standards system and best practices identified as recommendations ('should' statements). A six-month timeframe has been allowed to ensure that CBs have enough time to implement the criteria. ASR-114 will replace calibrations # 140 and 237, which will be retired once this document is mandatory on January 1, 2025.

See the policy here.

ASR-225, which was previously entitled "List of Banned Organizations", has now been revised in both title and scope. Previously, ASR-225 primarily served as a reference list of organizations banned from certification to Textile Exchange standards and focused on consolidating general certification eligibility criteria found in other documents. Now, it will serve as the central policy reference for general certification and accreditation eligibility criteria for all Textile Exchange standards.

ASR-225 still contains the list of ineligible entities, which will be updated periodically as needed. As with previous versions, any entity in the 'active bans' table shall be ineligible as of the 'ban issued' date listed.

Limited additional criteria were added in the update of ASR 225. In general, they were already the intent or required per existing policies and/or contracts and are enforceable under this policy.

Existing criteria related to general certification eligibility (not material or scope specific) that exist in other documents will be removed or replaced by a reference to ASR-225 Certification Eligibility Policy and List of Banned Entities upon the next revision of that document. All additional certification eligibility criteria (e.g. material or standard specific) found in other documents continue to apply.

This policy is effective (may be used as of) July 1, 2024, and becomes mandatory October 1, 2024.

Access the policy here.

Textile Exchange is dedicated to ensuring the safety and well-being of all stakeholders involved in the standards system. We have updated our ASR-109 Policy for Auditing Under Force Majeure Conditions to Version 2.1, effective July 1, 2024. This update aims to provide clarity and guidance on how certification activities will be managed under extraordinary circumstances.

Key Updates and Changes:

1. Policy Consolidation and Update Timeline:
   • The new policy consolidates previous guidance documents related to force majeure conditions, specifically those previously issued in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, into a single, streamlined document.
   • The updated policy, ASR-109-V2.1, becomes effective on July 1, 2024. All audits and assessments conducted on or after October 1, 2024, must adhere to this policy.
2. Identification of Force Majeure Conditions:
   • Force majeure is defined as unforeseen event or circumstance disrupting normal business operations. This includes public health directives, travel restrictions, organizational shutdowns, extreme weather conditions, and other significant disruptions.
   • Specific criteria have been outlined to identify force majeure conditions, such as public health advisories, travel bans, and organizational access restrictions.
3. Alternative Auditing Methods:
   • Certification bodies are permitted to use alternative auditing methods, including remote and hybrid audits, when standard auditing is not feasible provided the applicable criteria of ASR-109-V2.1 are met.
   • Extensions to scope certificate validity and deferred on-site audits are permitted under certain conditions without requiring prior approval from Textile Exchange provided the applicable criteria of ASR-109-V2.1 are met.
4. Risk Assessment and Auditing:
   • A detailed risk assessment methodology has been provided to determine the frequency and intensity of audits under force majeure conditions.
   • Certified organizations and subcontractors will be audited based on their risk level, ensuring that safety and compliance are maintained without unnecessary disruptions.
5. Certification Body Reporting and Exemptions:
   • Certification bodies must maintain detailed records of all audits conducted under force majeure conditions, including the auditing method used and the reasons for any deviations.
   • Provisions for requesting exemptions for extended audit delays or alternative methods have been clearly defined.
6. Additional Provisions:
   • The policy outlines specific conditions for the issuance of transaction certificates, closure of non-conformities, and auditor qualifications under force majeure conditions.
   • Provisions for managing accreditation and grace periods, as well as conducting unannounced audits, have been updated to ensure flexibility and conformity.
   
   
   What This Means for You:
   • Certified organizations should familiarize themselves with the updated policy and be prepared for potential changes in auditing schedules and methods should force majeure conditions arise.
   • Ensure that all relevant personnel are aware of the new guidelines and that your organization is ready to cooperate with certification bodies in implementing alternative auditing methods when necessary.
   • Maintain open communication with your certification body to address any concerns or requests for exemptions promptly.
   
   
   

   For more detailed information, please refer to the full policy document available on our website, or contact your certification body directly.

The RAF standards contain mandatory criteria related to animal and land management plans as well as declarations from external workers hired by the farm.

These criteria are designated as Major criteria, which results in some farm groups to be assigned a medium risk level and consequently a bigger sample size to be audited which increases the inspection cost.

While these criteria are important and shall be kept as Major criteria, they do not justify the higher risk designation.

Therefore, a calibration has been made in RAF-102 - Certification Procedures for Criterion D2.4.4.C, where the following bold/italic text has been added: No major non-conformities were issued for the scope certificate in the past year including during the previous audit except for criteria AW3.2, AW5.11.1, and LM2.1 in all RAF standards, i.e. RAF-101a-v2.2, RAF-101b-V1.2, and RAF-101c-V1.0.

This calibration means that non-conformities for the listed criteria above, do not prevent a low-risk score for the audited site.

Access the calibration log here.

Greasy wool, classified under the product category PC0045 (Unprocessed non-reclaimed fibers/materials), has traditionally been traded on EXW terms and stored at the seller's facility. This category has recently been incorporated into the ASR-213-V1.3 standard and also needed to be addressed in ASR-104-V3.1 - Policy for Transaction Certificates.

ASR-104-V3.1 A8.3.3.d now includes PC0045 alongside other categories.

Access the calibration log here.

Currently, the Content Claim Standard 3.1(CCS-101-V3.1 D5.4.1 and CCS-102-V3.1 D2.1.2.a, E2.1.1.f) requires the Animal Fiber Industry to have certain formal financial documents to be reviewed during/after the audit, which are not always available in their commercial practices.

Calibration 263 states that financial records standards in CCS-101-V3.1 D5.4.1 and CCS-102-V3.1 D2.1.2.a, E2.1.1.f are no longer needed for product categories: PC0032 - tops, PC0034 - undyed fibers, and PC0045 - unprocessed non-reclaimed fibers/materials, when the raw materials are limited to the following specific types:

• RM0003 - organic alpaca
• RM0007 - responsible alpaca
• RM0060 - organic mohair
• RM0064 - responsible mohair
• RM0079 - organic wool, and
• RM0083 - responsible wool

Access the calibration log here.

As per the latest Policy for Transaction Certificates, certification bodies are required to only use the Textile Exchange Authenticate a Transaction webpage (dTrackit) or another method provided by Textile Exchange to authenticate transaction certificates as of January 2024.

It is unclear if brands are expected to authenticate their incoming transaction certificates via the same means when they are making claims, since an outgoing transaction certificate is not required at the brand level.

If a transaction certificate is missing from the Textile Exchange Authenticate a Transaction webpage (dTrackit), the brand is not required to consider this a doubt regarding the validity of the claims, provided that the transaction certificate can be authenticated with the issuing certification body (e.g. via QR code).

If the input transaction certificate is not on the Textile Exchange Authenticate a Transaction webpage (dTrackit), no output transaction certificate (e.g. from brand to retailer) is possible.

Access the calibration log here.

Calibration 251 outlined cases where the consignee did not need to be a facility on a certified buyer's scope certificate, as required by ASR-104-V3.1 B2.9.6.b, if one of the 6 incoterms listed in the calibration were used.

FAS has been added to incoterms in the original calibration. The total list now includes: FCA, CPT, CIP, FAS, FOB, CFR, and CIF. The calibration update also clarifies that a reference to the shipment number is included if it is not the same for all shipments on the TC. Additionally, if the exact port facility is not known when the TC is issued, the port itself may be a consignee.

For an Incoterm of EXW, see ASR-104-V3.1 B2.9.6.c. Incoterms of DAP, DPU, and DDP, as well as sales that are not conducted according to an Incoterm are not covered by this calibration.

Textile Exchange recognizes that there is feedback from the industry on the overall definition and use of the term consignee. This has been flagged for review in the next revision of ASR-104 Transaction Certificate Policy, which governs the term consignee. In the meantime, feedback and case studies from industry stakeholders will be collected and incorporated into the policy revision process.

Access the calibration log here.

According to the section B2.2.3 in the Policy for Transaction Certificates, if the seller on a TC is not the certified organization (the main site specified on the scope certificate), the name of the certified organization (sellerCertifiedOrganizationName) shall be specified beside “Selling on behalf of”. Similar criteria apply for the buyer (B2.3.3).

There has been ambiguity around what the sellerTeId and buyerTeId fields on a TC refer to – whether it denotes the facility conducting the sale/purchase or the certified organization (main site specified on the scope certificate of the seller/buyer). The field sellerTeId shall always include a valid TE-ID and the field buyerTeId shall always include a valid TE-ID if the buyer is certified.

The fields sellerTeId and buyerTeId should include the TE-IDs of the facilities listed as the seller/buyer on the TC. It is also acceptable to include the TE-IDs of the certified organizations which the seller/buyer is conducting the sale/purchase on behalf of. The dTrackit system is able to connect a facility's TE-ID back to the certified organization.

Access the calibration log here.

ASR-213 Materials, Processes & Products Classification has been revised to include minor updates. It now contains categories and codes that previously existed within calibrations but have been incorporated into the policy.

• Code updates in Table 3.1- Raw Materials Classification: Additionally, "Protein" was moved between categories though codes did not change. A duplicated listing of "wood" was removed.
• Addition of "Mixed down and feather" as Raw Material in Table 3.1.
• Code updates in Table 3.2- Process Category Classification: Additionally, "Grading" has been added as Process Category.
• Codes in Section 3.2.6.4 have been corrected: PR0048 is now PR0031 and PR0031 is now PR0048.
• Table 3.3: Product Category Classification: Addition of Product Categories "Unprocessed non-reclaimed fibers/materials" and Processed pre- and post-consumer materials.
• Appendix A - Raw Materials Mapping:
  • Addition of "Mixed down and feather", "Grease", "Leather", "Shearling" and "Animal Fiber Other" to Animal Classification.
  • Addition of "Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS)", "Synthetic rubber", "Thermoplastic elastomer (TPE)", "Thermoplastic rubber (TPR)" to Synthetic Classification.
  • Addition of "Diacetate" to Cellulosic Classification.
  • Addition of "Protein" and "wood" to Miscellaneous Classification.

It should be noted that ASR-213 reflects what inputs are allowed for use in the standards system. It does not define eligibility for standards such as the GRS or RCS. An update of the GRS-202: Textile Exchange Guide to Recycled Inputs, the document that defines such eligibility will take place in 2024.

See the policy here.

No specific policy update and/or calibration issued this month.

According to section B2.9.6.b in ASR-104-V3.1, a consignee must be a facility on a buyer's scope certificate if the buyer is certified. In response to identifying situations where this criterion is not workable, Calibration 251 was issued on March 1st. It was effective immediately upon publication and is mandatory no later than July 1, 2024.

The calibration states that a facility which is not named on the buyer’s scope certificate may be listed as a consignee provided that one of the 6 incoterms mentioned in the calibration are used. These are FCA, CPT, CIP, FOB, CFR, and CIF.

The buyer’s certification body must review transport documentation from the consignee to the buyer's facility either as part of issuing the subsequent transaction certificate or on a sampling basis as part of the next audit of the buyer (e.g. when the buyer is a brand and does not obtain outgoing transaction certificates).

If the buyer on a transaction certificate is a certified trader who does not take physical possession of the product, the consignee must match the consignee listed on the trader's outgoing transaction certificate.

Incoterms®2020 are critical to understanding this calibration. More information about Incoterms including definitions for each individual Incoterm may be found at https://www.trade.gov/know-your-incoterms.

Access the calibration log here.

We have published several new translations of standards documents, which are available publicly in our website Knowledge Center and directly via the links below:

OCS-101-V3.0-TR Organic Content Standard - Turkish (Türkçe).

Other previously published translations are available publicly in the Knowledge Center and through this post on The Hub shared within the Standards Stakeholder Community.

Although these are official translations by Textile Exchange, please note that the English version of each document takes precedence in case of any contradiction or discrepancy between versions.

We have published several new translations of standards documents, which are available publicly in our website Knowledge Center and directly via the links below:

RCS-101-V2.0-TR Recycled Claim Standard - Turkish (Türkçe)

Other previously published translations are available publicly in the Knowledge Center and through this post on The Hub shared within the Standards Stakeholder Community.

Although these are official translations by Textile Exchange, please note that the English version of each document takes precedence in case of any contradiction or discrepancy between versions.

We have published several new translations of standards documents, which are available publicly in our website Knowledge Center and directly via the links below:

CCS-201-V3.1-CN CCS User Manual - Chinese (中文)

Other previously published translations are available publicly in the Knowledge Center and through this post on The Hub shared within the Standards Stakeholder Community.

Although these are official translations by Textile Exchange, please note that the English version of each document takes precedence in case of any contradiction or discrepancy between versions.

The ASR-106 policy, or the Accepted Equivalent Standards Policy, has been updated and is effective on April 1, 2024, and mandatory on July 1, 2024.

The main updates in this policy were to ensure the GOTS references were based on the most recent versions, GOTS 6.0 and GOTS 7.0.

There are additional references that CB data submissions must be sent via the methods previously approved by Textile Exchange.

These references detail that CBs receive automatic confirmation from Textile Exchange that documentation has been successfully submitted. No further confirmation is required from Textile Exchange in order for the CB to issue the relevant TC if the TC application is considered complete by the CB.

Lastly, the criteria allowances for GOTS sites wanting to add OCS SCs to their scope which expired in June of 2023 were removed for clarity.

Access the policy here.

The OCS-105 policy, or OCS In-Conversion Policy, has been updated and is effective April 1, 2024.

The primary update is removing the end date of the policy, which was previously June 30th, 2024. No new end date has been included in the policy, meaning the allowance for in-conversion material in OCS supply chains may continue indefinitely.

There are additional references that CB data submissions must be sent via the methods previously approved by Textile Exchange.

These references detail that CBs receive automatic confirmation from Textile Exchange that documentation has been successfully submitted. No further confirmation is required from Textile Exchange in order for the CB to issue the relevant TC if the TC application is considered complete by the CB.

The OCS is planned to undergo a revision in 2024, and we will revisit all related policies, including OCS-105, to determine if changes are necessary to align with the revised standard.

Access the policy here .

Per CCS-101-V3.1-C5.1, a subcontractor shall not have common ownership with the contracting organization, thus the contracting organization is not permitted to list a facility under common ownership as an associated subcontractor.

In response to requests arising from various factors such as geographic considerations and differences in certification bodies, Calibration 252 allows an independently certified subcontractor under common ownership with the contracting organization to be listed as an independently certified subcontractor under the contracting organization's scope certificate.

According to CCS-102-D3.4.1, the independently certified subcontractor shall not be audited as part of the contracting organization’s audit.

Textile Exchange encourages sites under common ownership to be included under the same scope certificate (preferred) or separate scope certificates with the same certification body where workable.

Access the calibration log here.

Textile Exchange has issued a Policy for a Moratorium on Farm Area Certification in the RDS effective on March 1, 2024. The moratorium proposes a gradual phase-out of the Farm Area Certification. In practice, this means:

• From the effective date of the policy, no new RDS Farm Area applications are accepted for organizations that wish to become certified to the Responsible Down Standard 3.0, under Section E - Farm Area Certification;
• Certified organizations that currently hold or previously held farm area certification in the past year (2023) are allowed to renew certified farm areas, with the caveat that no new farm areas can be added;
• Small slaughter sites must adhere to all the requirements of the Responsible Down Standard 3.0 Section B4 Slaughter Certification and must undergo annual audits by the certification body.

See policy document here.

The RDS-102, or the RDS Certification Procedures, was revised to reflect the updated criteria in the RDS-105 Policy for a Moratorium on Farm Area Certification, effective on March 1, 2024.

See policy document here.

In some jurisdictions, consumer protection laws may prohibit the use of the “chasing arrows” or Mobius loop symbol on products that are not recyclable. The current GRS and RCS logos include this symbol and, as a result, may not be allowed for use in some product-related claims.

Calibration 254 was issued to provide flexibility for GRS and RCS product-related claims, by allowing the exclusion of the relevant Standard logo and the use of a text claim only.

Access the calibration log here.

This quick guide serves as an introductory resource for brands interested in adopting the eTrackit system. The document offers an overview of the eTrackit system, outlines the eligibility requirements to use eTrackit, and assists in mapping the necessary steps for successful onboarding.

Access the eTrackit Quick Guide for Brands here.

The implementation of the Textile Exchange-ID (TE-ID) in early 2024 requires some clarification.

Textile Exchange is providing Certification Bodies (CBs) with lists of pre-assigned TE-IDs for facilities listed in dTrackit on a Scope Certificate (SC) in three batches. Based on this, the calibration provides clarifications for the implementation of the TE-ID in the first quarter of 2024.

Additionally, when an organization registers to create or claim their TE-ID, there can be a delay of up to 14 calendar days before the TE-ID is provided.

Click here for more guidance on TE-ID.

Access the calibration log here.

TE-ID will be used to identify a facility in Textile Exchange's database, replacing the requirement of using the license number and the name of the responsible Certification Body (CB) for all assured claims. Therefore, there will be an extended period during which claims can use either license number accompanied by the CB's name or solely the organization's TE-ID. Currently, it is an option to use TE-ID or the license number when making claims.

Once the Standards Claims Policy is updated to align with the unified standard development, TE-ID will be required with assured claims. The use of license number and the CB's name will be allowed on claims only for the remaining lifespan of the current standards.

Access the calibration log here.